cobra3073

I use Hagerty for my classic car insurance needs. They have some EXTREMELY knowledgeable people and the process appears identical to the American Collection Insurance process cited by Jholmes217 and MustangGt. Essentially, you will fill out a form with the particulars on your vehicle to include any modifications, how often (number of miles) you will be using it and place a value on what you think it is worth. I also had to submit pictures of the car. In my case, I indicated that I might periodically race the vehicle which was not a problem, although they did not cover either one of them while I am "on the track" or actively racing. They even have a process and plan to cover classic cars that are under construction which allows one to raise the insured value as the vehicle takes shape. BT

Sent you a PM on the deluxe door panels. BT

The 80427 is a 4160 Model Carb with an advertised CFM of 600. It has an electric choke, takes the standard 4160 Renew Kit (37-119) and Trick Kit (37-192). BT

Yes, you are correct in your deciphering of the gear ratio. Provider has to do with the aftermarket companies such as Currie, Strange, etc. Here is a link to a company that carries the 8" carrier (center section) as a complete unit. You should be able to utilize your current housing and axles. http://www.justrearends.com/ Yes, there is an 8" and a 9" rear end. Both 8" and 9" rears could come with the same number of splines on the axles (28) while the 31 spline axles are found only on the 9", per the sources. For the '69 Mustangs, the 9" rear end was generally found on 351, 428 and 429 engines. Generally speaking as it pertains to Mustangs, the 7 3/4" rear end came on those built with the six cylinder engine. Our external discussion on this thread had to do with whether or not some 302 engines (which usually came with an 8") might have come with a 7 3/4" inch ring gear. I am sorry if this somewhat "off-topic" discussion may have caused confusion. BT

Sounds like a "plan." Like Machspeed, I am also looking at acquiring a fuel tank. Thanks! BT

I purchased these off Ebay over the weekend. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-1970-FORD-MUSTANG-MACH-1-BUCKET-SEATS-BLACK-w-RED-STRIPE-/181028901519?pt=Vintage_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2a2629d28f&vxp=mtr The JOURNEY has begun! BT

I faced a similar dilemma with the '69 Mach 1 that I acquired last week. In my case, I purchased the Mustang sans interior, so I did not even have the frames. While I am going Resto-Mod, I want to keep the stock appearance. I went out on Ebay and my offer was accepted for these: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1969-1970-FORD-MUSTANG-MACH-1-BUCKET-SEATS-BLACK-w-RED-STRIPE-/181028901519?pt=Vintage_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item2a2629d28f&vxp=mtr This was after during all the computations for installing all "new" parts from a Vendor. Even if I have to replace the upholstery, I figured I came out ahead of the game. BT

Didn't see it in his ad but did the sending unit come with the tank or was it a separate order? Thanks! BT

First off Mike, I will submit that I am biased toward the "bigger" the better and at heart am a "Racer." However, over the decades I have come to appreciate something that I haven't always considered in my own modifications of my Fords, Lincolns and Mercurys. ...and that is "What do you want from the vehicle most of the times." It really requires a SERIOUS and REALISTIC evaluation. For "shows" (and bragging rights), I would imagine it is nice to post up all the "internal" modifications. On the other hand, for cruising on the street you REALLY will not be turning it to 8K, so some of those much-hyped modifications are probably self-defeating. On the street it is about torque. Generally speaking, the bigger the motor the more torque it generates at a lower RPM (all things considered). We, as enthusiasts, often mimic what is happening in the racing world. Unfortunately, what works on the 1/4 or 1/8 track is not optimum for general street cruising. Mike, sometimes it helps to take a "deep breath" and think about what you will be happy with MOST of the time, prior to making your decision on modifications to your Mustang. BT

...and I ABSOLUTELY believe you as it relates to your inference that "The Hollander" is not necessarily correct. Yes, I too have spent a LOT of time in the junk yards (hence the reference to Hollander) searching for the "gold." I also confess that in my nearly 40 years of swapping out Ford engines, rear ends and transmissions, I have not concentrated on the small block stuff (other than the Clevelands) so I have never even CHECKED a "regular" 302 Mustang rear end. I, too, am not trying to be "argumentative" but was just curious...still am. BT

According to "The Hollander", the 1969 Mustangs with 302 engines could have either the 8" or the 7 3/4" diameter ring gears. It is pretty well accepted that "during the day", Ford routinely utilized "mis-matched" parts on the line, when necessary. I would be curious as to what Members on the Site originally had in their "regular" 1969 302 based Mustangs for ring gears. Hope this is not off topic. BT

As Maxum 96 noted and/or inferred, ALL 1969 351 (2V and 4V) Mach 1 should have a 9" ring gear set from the factory. Most of them share a 28 spline axles but some might have the 31 spline axles. The 302s would have an 8" or 7 3/4" ring gear but that application was not available for the 1969 Mach 1. I missed it but if you post up your rear end code, we should be able to tell you exactly what your Mustang came with from the factory. Also, as noted, the 8'' stuff might be more expensive to acquire than the 9" but their are "providers." The easiest approach would be to just drop in a complete 9" carrier with the 28 spline as you would not have to change your axles shafts unless you go to 31 or 35 spline. BT

As it relates to 7W and 7WA: Trim designators as previously discussed normally consist of a two-digit code with the first digit indicating the grade of the interior material. The second digit identifies the predominant color of the interior seating surface. The occasional third digit indicates some type of trim deviation. A "letter" deviation indicates a "dealer serviceable" deviation which means if it needed to be replaced it could be ordered through an authorized Ford dealer. A "number" designator deviation was only available through the dealer service representative and then only if the item was still being used on the production line. In the case of your 1969 Convertible, the 7W codes out to the Interior Decor Bucket White Seats and Black appointments (e.g. carpet, dashpad). The 7WA codes would be the same with the addition of dark woodgrain pattern on the door panel with front and rear seat back variation. Source: The Mustang and Cougar Tagbook (1965-1973 models) by Kevn Marti, Pages 57 and 58. Hope this helps. BT

While stationed at Clark AB, there was a guy running a 460 in a rail and i later learned he was turning that puppy in excess of 6500 RPM. Quite frankly, I could not see it at the time as I was running 351Cs or versions of the 427/428CJ in my '73 Mach. I thought the 429/460 was a bit sedate and that he was only running in the 9s/10s because of his weight. My current 472 (.060 1970 460) in my '73 Grande with mildly ported D0VE heads and RPM camshaft makes in excess of 500HP (and torque) and has no problem "catching a breath." Mind you, this is a very streetable build. I essentially used this motor and the Grande chassis as templates for the 545 (429SCJ block bored .030 with a 4.500" forged crank) solid roller motor I am putting in my '73 Mach 1 that should easily make power to 7000 RPM. This is with ported (and flowed - 372.8 Intake/243.6 Exhaust at .750 lift) Trick Flow Streets and a modified 1000HP Carb. The 429/460 motors can very EASILY be made into MONSTERS! This is especially true with the early (pre 1974 heads) that only require some slight porting to handle that breathing problem. It appears we have a number of military folks on this Site and I am really feeling "welcome." As previously noted, I am really looking forward to interacting with y'all on the different Forums. BT

Roger that! Since I already have the engine, transmission and rear end, I had been scouring different sources trying to find just this kind of deal. And as another Member noted, it apparently was a project that someone had sunk money into it and lost interest and/or ran out of treasure. The real upside is that it was within 10 miles of my home at a Shop I have done business with for over 10 years. It had just been sitting there covered up, waiting for me. BT

Well, I went over and sealed the deal on the '69 Mach 1 today. I am REALLy impressed with the fact that the body is perfectly straight with ABSOLUTELY no rust or bondo. Here are a couple of pictures. I will be providing periodic updates. The "Restorer" has most of the trim pieces. I am going to have to acquire the front bucket seats and some odds and ends for the interior such as a headliner. The First Lady and I are still trying to decide on the final exterior color prior to constructing the interior. I have the "Marti Report" and it originally came with an H-Code with FMX, New Lime externally and white interior. Quite frankly, I am kind of gravitating toward "Sinister" Black but we shall see. I have some photos of my '73 Mach 1, my '73 Grande and my 2003 Marauder in my folder. Again, I am really looking forward to this journey. BT

Well, I went over and sealed the deal on the '69 Mach 1 today. I am REALLy impressed with the fact that the body is perfectly straight with ABSOLUTELY no rust or bondo. Here are a couple of pictures. I will be providing periodic updates. The "Restorer" has most of the trim pieces. I am going to have to acquire the front bucket seats and some odds and ends for the interior such as a headliner. The First Lady and I are still trying to decide on the final exterior color prior to constructing the interior. I have the "Marti Report" and it originally came with an H-Code with FMX, New Lime externally and white interior. Quite frankly, I am kind of gravitating toward "Sinister" Black but we shall see. I have some photos of my '73 Mach 1, my '73 Grande and my 2003 Marauder in my folder. Again, I am really looking forward to this journey. BT

Hi Everybody! I just registered today and thought I might use this opportunity to introduce myself and my plans for a 1969 Mach I that I am purchasing on tomorrow. I am a 30-year retired AF Chief Master Sergeant and a 17-year retired Federal Investigator. I have owned and raced a number of Ford/Lincoln/Mercury vehicles with the current stable consisting of a 2013 Lincoln MKT, a 2003 Mercury Marauder, a 1989 5.0 LX, a 1973 Mach 1 (currently with a 1969 428CJ Motor and Toploader) and a 1973 Grande (with a .060 over mildly modified 460 with C6). I built the Grande as a prelude to my swapping the 428CJ out of the Mach 1 for a 545 (429SCJ Block, RPM 4.500" crank with Charlie Evans ported Trick Flow Streets). While the Grande was undergoing paint, I noticed that the Restorer had a 1969 Mach 1 there that had all the body work completed. It will need the interior and a hood and we settled on a deal just today. My plan is to install the 428CJ and a C6 (cast iron tail shaft from a 428CJ) in the 1969 Mach 1 and give it to my youngest son on his 16th birthday (2 years hence). While I have the utmost confidence in my "Restorer", I look forward to interacting with you all as I continue this journey. Again, most of my experience has been with the 1971 - 1973 Mustangs. In fact, I am a Moderator on a Site dedicated to those years. As some of you may have surmised, my primary interest in the past has been in the 1/4 mile racing world. I am looking forward to learning a LOT more about the 1969/1970 Mustangs and look forward to interacting on the individual Forums. BT

Hi Everybody! I just registered today and thought I might use this opportunity to introduce myself and my plans for a 1969 Mach I that I am purchasing on tomorrow. I am a 30-year retired AF Chief Master Sergeant and a 17-year retired Federal Investigator. I have owned and raced a number of Ford/Lincoln/Mercury vehicles with the current stable consisting of a 2013 Lincoln MKT, a 2003 Mercury Marauder, a 1989 5.0 LX, a 1973 Mach 1 (currently with a 1969 428CJ Motor and Toploader) and a 1973 Grande (with a .060 over mildly modified 460 with C6). I built the Grande as a prelude to my swapping the 428CJ out of the Mach 1 for a 545 (429SCJ Block, RPM 4.500" crank with Charlie Evans ported Trick Flow Streets). While the Grande was undergoing paint, I noticed that the Restorer had a 1969 Mach 1 there that had all the body work completed. It will need the interior and a hood and we settled on a deal just today. My plan is to install the 428CJ and a C6 (cast iron tail shaft from a 428CJ) in the 1969 Mach 1 and give it to my youngest son on his 16th birthday (2 years hence). While I have the utmost confidence in my "Restorer", I look forward to interacting with you all as I continue this journey. Again, most of my experience has been with the 1971 - 1973 Mustangs. In fact, I am a Moderator on a Site dedicated to those years. As some of you may have surmised, my primary interest in the past has been in the 1/4 mile racing world. I am looking forward to learning a LOT more about the 1969/1970 Mustangs and look forward to interacting on the individual Forums. BT