Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
prayers1

need pics of rear proportionate valve

Recommended Posts

Switching from front drum to front 1970 disc, Going to use the manual distribution block and plumb a rear proportionate valve.

 

Does it have to be mounted or can it just hang in the air, I prefer the latter. It's pretty tough for me to mount it, its just because of the doubled covered lines I'm using, it prevents bending near the fitting.

 

Examples of install with pictures would be nice.

 

How do you start of with the rear adjustment.

 

Thanks for your help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pic of my 69, similar to 70. The pic should be flipped for proper orientation on car.

 

 

IMG_20121106_171130_zps81c47b80.jpg

 

 

It bolts to the left rear fender apron in the recessed area with two holes about 1-1/2" apart.

 

 

IMG_20131110_115503_zps0d6b456a.jpg

 

Since you've received no 70 pics, this may help.

 

 

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1970 was different. In '69 the proportioning valve was external of the distribution block as shown in the picture. In '70 the proportioning valve was internal to the distribution block.

 

'69

http://www2.cougarpartscatalog.com/store/p/13905-Brake-Distribution-Block-Proportioning-Valve-Assembly-Disc-Power-Brake-Repro-1968-1969-Mercury-Cougar-1968-1969-Ford-Mustang.html

 

'70

http://www.classicrods.com/mbm-1960-70s-ford-proportioning-valve/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops, I again misread a post. Sorry about that. I bolted mine to the firewall. It's a Wilwood and plenty light, but don't think I'd run it not bolted down. Too much vibrations to sorry about. If you get the small cylinder style prop valve I wouldn't worry about bolting it down. I used that style on a 56 F100 without issue.

 

IMG_20131110_113530_zps3e63d78a.jpg

 

 

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It looks like you guys have custom lines. I'm unfortunate, since I'm working with the actual stock line, it's a lot harder to bend.

 

Personally, I would replace the stock drum brake distribution block with a '70 disc brake proportioning valve. I'm not sure if the threaded fittings on the drum brake lines are the same size as disc brakes. Below is a link that shows the measurements for the disc brake prop valve. Also it wouldn't hurt to call Chockostang and ask them, they are good people and very knowledgeable.

 

But if you are doing a swap with factory style disc brakes then I think you may be over-thinking this whole process. I had manual drums on my Torino and swapped over to factory style power disc. I purchased the disc prop valve and a new set of disc brake lines which totaled right around $200 (for prop valve and hard lines). But the trade off was knowing that everything was going to be a direct bolt on and that I wasn't going to have to spend time modifying anything. A little extra money for less time and less headache is well worth it to me.

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/65-66-68-70-73-MUSTANG-DISC-BRAKE-PROPORTIONING-VALVE-/231213435322?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&fits=Year%3A1970|Model%3AMustang&hash=item35d56509ba&vxp=mtr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I did over think and hard lesson learned.

 

Actually, I have a 70 Prop/Dist valve, I spoke to Ckockostang and he's the one who told me not to bother, just use the 69 Manual Dist block and put a rear porp, valve for the rear. He supplied everything, including the 1974 Maverick master cylinder.

 

I could of used the original lines (drum front hard lines) but the motor and trans are out as well as the entire front suspension and I had the stupid ideal to get 70 front lines, I thought it would be easier, then I said why not replace all the lines, so I bought a front to back hard line. Problem is on the pre-formed lines there is another line over the original,somewhat of a protector and it made it so hard to bend. Long story short I wound up getting lines made at NAPA just to route the new master to the manual dist block and the rear port valve. I'll have to show picture, even I;m getting confused.

 

Buckeye, good to know to start with 1/2 way on the valve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...I see where Chocko was coming from. First of all if you are going from manual drum to manual disc, then to save having to replace hard lines his suggestion is just to cut and splice in the external '69 prop valve in the rear. That makes since....However if you are going from manual drum to power disc, the hard lines up front are different because the master cylinder sits farther away from the firewall due to the brake booster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your correct on the Power vs. Manual cylinders, but the reason why I'm using a 74 Maverick Master cylinder is that it is Manual Disc.

 

I like where you guys mounted the rear prop. valve against the firewall. My lines look like a bunch of spaghetti and are dry fitted. I'll take the rear line and have NAPA shorten it to fit the prop valve against the fire wall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another way around this problem is to use smaller wheel cylinders in the rear drums. Factory rear cylinders are 7/8", so use 13/16". This is a common swap here in Australia where we use readily available Aussie Falcon front disc set up (identical to stock 69-70 front brakes) with Falcon wheel cylinders (13/16) without the prop valve. I believe stock big block 69-70 Mustangs came with 13/16" rear wheel cylinders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

shaun071 - I really don't like to experiment with the brakes, but that is very interesting to know. If what I have doesn't work (and I can't see why not) I'd go with a 70 Pro/dist block.

 

Here's a picture of my spaghetti lines. You can see the line going to the bottom of the valve is double wrapped and is too hard to bend, that's why the valve is in it's present position.

 

After seeing what others have done, I make the switch to the firewall by splicing in between the line and getting rind of the double wrapped line.

DSC01875_zps23cf52de.jpg

Edited by prayers1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...