Jump to content

Mach1 Driver

Members
  • Content Count

    2,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    86

Posts posted by Mach1 Driver


  1. As I said in my previous post, power for the pump is coming from fuse #1. The first drawing is a schematic, not a wire diagram- follow the yellow, and disregard everything else, if you are only interested in the washer pump. The second drawing is a wire diagram. If you need this diagram, follow this link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/10FqYlsGT1XXr8B5TCF9WAASkU4vdPtuJ?usp=sharing

    Schematics simplify the circuit so you can see how it works, while wire diagrams show all the plugs and wire colors and actual wire routing. 

    image.thumb.png.0ee373141a3806cbe02af8e3e93f6068.png

    image.png.e6cfc49d6bad5b426dedf17fe84cf735.png


  2. 9 minutes ago, GearHeadPeter said:

    When I glued in my windows on my 69 vert I used 3M Channel Bonding and Sidelite Adhesive, 08641, 47.3 mL Cartridge with the Dispenser Gun, 50ml Dispensing Gun Kit Impression Mixing Dispensing Dispenser AB Gun 1:1/1:2 that I got on Amazon for $22.  https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07JMXTBW6/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

    Everything worked great and it was so much easier than using a caulking gun with various items installed to try to make it work.  Yes, I tried it and it was a disaster.

    Did you need to use the static mixing nozzles too?

    https://www.amazon.com/Pieces-Adhesive-Mixing-Nozzle-Applicatior/dp/B07T72C2TB/ref=pd_bxgy_img_sccl_1/132-0550893-9470358?pd_rd_w=P3Sd1&content-id=amzn1.sym.7f0cf323-50c6-49e3-b3f9-63546bb79c92&pf_rd_p=7f0cf323-50c6-49e3-b3f9-63546bb79c92&pf_rd_r=AP6STXHS7V859CHDNKEM&pd_rd_wg=PzTJE&pd_rd_r=a7a36a27-6fe2-4eaf-96d8-16a8018d80dc&pd_rd_i=B07T72C2TB&psc=1


  3. ep, as Mid says, its probably the neutral safety. Power comes from the battery, goes through the ignition switch, through the neutral safety and to the starter solenoid. If the solenoid doesn't even click, then it is either the ignition switch, the neutral safety, or the wire connections somewhere along the line.

    This is a schematic, not a wire diagram:

    image.thumb.png.9b49bb06a2c9356c845ae763d2a51498.png

    Below is the exact circuit, but in wire diagram form. The schematic is intended to show how it works, and the wire diagram shows you how to wire the car. Most people find the schematic much easier to read.

    image.thumb.png.8f8b61b1e3b1dfd1feab62f2d4aa6a59.png

     

     


  4. From what I've read, swapping brake parts around can lead to just this kind of incompatibility problem. Many knowledgeable people prefer to only rebuild the original master cylinder- Booster Dewey (now Booster Steve) being one of the two shops I've heard of that can do so. There is so much misinformation about what replacement booster will fit and operate properly, that you really should watch the two videos that follow. Perhaps you can get the original back, or if not maybe you can purchase one that has already been rebuilt. 

     


  5. 1. Is it a factory tach car?

    2. Are you running the Pertronix at 12v or off the resistor wire? Does AAW even use a resistor wire?

    Part of my the problem is that since its not stock and I don't know how AAW does this stuff. If you answer those questions I can show you how Ford did it in wire diagram form and in schematic form, and that may help you.

    The Pertronix modules seem to run better at 12v, instead of 9v, but there is a method to do that and still run a factory tach. The factory tachs are current sensitive and raising the voltage raises the current, which makes them go wacky.


  6. 4 hours ago, det0326 said:

    Don't know if this will help or not Terry and remember I'm old and going on memory here. In my 69 everything on the front of the chassis  anyway was completely stock. I had the Edelbrock RPM performer, no carb spacer, the FiTech and a 2 inch thick aftermarket air filter. I used clay on top of filter housing and shut the hood, I had about .9 thousand of an inch clearance.

    Thanks Dave, do you remember if the air cleaner had a drop base?


  7. 7 hours ago, EastYorkStang said:

    From Edelbrocks website.

    Manifold height: A-3.55", B-4.75", same as stock; Carb pad height: 4.15";

    My shaker fits nicely in the opening not too high. If the 3" spec was correct my shaker would be lower

    What part number manifold is that for?

    I don't have a shaker, but my completely stock 351w 2V manifold has a 1" spacer under the carb (actually 1.025"). Are you accounting for that? The manifold is 3", the spacer is 1", the carb is 3.25", and whatever room is left is for the air cleaner under the hood or shaker assembly that goes through the hood. I can't argue what the shaker does- I just don't know. My effort was to see what manifold would fit under the hood for a 4v carb or EFI without modifying the hood, engine mounts, etc.

     69Mach1 M code has stated the carb pad height for a stock 4v manifold is 3.0", and unless someone can show me other front and rear numbers for a stock manifold, I'm going with that. I don't believe what Edelbrock is saying because the numbers change depending on who you talk to. They don't seem to really know what the stock manifold height is, and without that you have no basis for comparison.

    Edit: Here is an example of more double talk from Edelbrock- I received this email from their tech department only moments ago:

    Hello Terry, our Website changed so we are now able to Sell Consumer Direct and our Merger with the Comp Cams Group, we are not The Edelbrock Group, our Performer Intake Manifold # 2181 for your application is the same height as Factory OE 4-bbl Intake Manifolds, and it is 4.07” Tall, The PRM Intake Manifold # 7181 is 4.80” tall so right at 3/4" Taller, hope this helps you.

     


  8. 6 hours ago, EastYorkStang said:

    With my car I had an Edelbrock Performer RPM. This put the shaker in direct contact with the hood. After researcing intakes I found their Torker manifold to be the stock height. This cured the clearance issue.

    FYI, the Edelbrock Torker II #5081 has a pad height of 4.150, which is 1.015" higher than stock. No web hits on just a "Torker".

    Edelbrock has given me multiple numbers which were ALL erroneous for the stock carb pad height. Since we now know that the stock height is 3.0" (thanks to 69Mach1 M code), its easy to make a round chunk of plywood of the proper thickness and stick it on top of your air cleaner and see how close it gets to the hood before investing in a new intake that may not fit. If you've got a shaker, you can make a plywood spacer and stick it under the carb to check the height. 


  9. 23 minutes ago, ray1970 said:

    Been a long time.  Life can change fast. Finley got the horn done the_DSC6224.thumb.JPG.b953c955962b78670a3a7041d058c5a1.JPG way I wanted it.

    Hi Ray, long time no see. So you fashioned a switch out of the center medallion? I can see the terminal.

    After replacing several rim blow switches I put a switch under the center and rigged up a way to let the medallion pivot slightly to press the switch- way back in the 70s or 80s, and still working which is more than I can say for rim blow switches.  


  10. It could be the valve, but one of a few problems with Holleys is that the fuel bowls are hanging out there on the ends and use gaskets to seal them up to the metering blocks. Some guys say they have to replace the blasted things yearly or they leak, especially since the addition of alcohol to the fuel.  It sounds like its time to change the gaskets Sam.

    First I would replace the gaskets, but Instead of cranking for a long time it would be better to use one of those oil squirt cans filled with gasoline and pump it down the bowl vents till working the throttle gets the boosters to squirt. The wiring to the solenoid is actually under size and if you crank it for a long time it has been known to smoke the wire, according to Midlife, who is our premier harness fixer-upper.

×
×
  • Create New...